Leading Reframed

Leading Insights for a Changing World

Strategic Leadership as Understanding

By Dr. James Schindler
For more than 100 years, managers have relied on four basic duties: planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. These ideas emerged when businesses were stable and predictable, so managers could assume markets, company structures, and performance systems would largely remain the same. Today's workplaces are totally different. They face constant change, uncertainty, and complexity. As Esenyel states, modern leaders cannot keep up with fast digital advances and diverse teams¹. Old management functions are still useful, but old ways of viewing them no longer fit today's organizational reality.

Planning as Strategic Foresight

At one point, planning focused on predicting the future, maintaining stability, and making long-term plans. Strategic leaders take a very different approach. For them, planning is strategic foresight: a constant evaluation of the environment to spot early signals of change and to plan for multiple possible futures simultaneously. They don’t just assume the situation is stable; they build flexible planning systems that rely on scenario thinking, real-time data, and cross-organizational collaboration. As Day and Schoemaker note, foresight is a core leadership skill that is now essential because it enables organizations to anticipate disruption rather than react to it 2. Planning then becomes a leadership practice grounded in agility, resilience, and imagination. These qualities allow an organization to act confidently amid uncertainty.

Organizing as Designing for Flexibility and Networks

Traditional organizing emphasized formal systems, hierarchical structures, and fixed roles, but strategic leaders have moved well beyond that model. They set up flexible structures, with teams and networks to make quick changes when needed. As digital transformation and cross-sector collaboration reshape work, adaptability must come first. As Esenyel puts it, this means fostering an inclusive, digitally connected environment. To organize effectively now, build partner networks, spread knowledge, and let teams decide what to do. A good strategic leader sets the organization up not to be held back by old ways of doing things, but to meet fresh challenges with confidence and creativity3.

Leading as Mobilizing People and Purpose Across Boundaries

Traditional management followed a straightforward model: leaders told people what to do and then motivated them to complete the task. Strategic leaders have a broader horizon. They seek an inspirational common purpose that brings people together to work and belong to the community and its industries. This kind of leadership is systemic and relational; it is about reading the situation and understanding the bigger picture. It requires emotional intelligence, cultural sensitivity, and the ability to work harmoniously across diverse teams so they can make contributions and take big risks. Uhl-Bien and Arena stated: contemporary leadership is no longer just about authority, but about allowing people to adapt4. That means leading collective sensemaking in uncertain times and favoring experimentation and teamwork. Strategic leaders then use their power to build the external networks and partnerships that put the organization in a better position to deal with whatever lies ahead.

Controlling as Enabling Learning, Feedback, and Adaptive Governance

Historically, managers exercised control through rule enforcement and performance checks, stepping in to correct problems as they arose. Strategic leaders are not so inclined; they prefer a more forward-looking perspective. For them, control is better understood as adaptive governance. This leadership style is built on real-time insight, rapid feedback, and a culture of continuous learning, enabling the organization to anticipate change. In this view, control supports and strengthens people, rather than punishing them. To foster improvement and make wiser decisions, these strategic leaders will rely on data analytics, open measures, and low-risk, small-scale experiments. As Edmondson has pointed out, you see better results from systems predicated on learning than from ones run on strict rules, since the former are more likely to elicit innovation and promptness. The strategic leader aims to establish a form of governance that does not impede the organization but enables it to adapt and perform well, with continuous learning and no delay in feedback5.

Leadership Forward Synthesis

A strategic leader sees the four time-honored functions of management in a different light: no longer mere tasks, but dynamic forms of leadership. Take planning, for instance; it is an exercise in looking ahead to what may lie in store. Organizing is about putting in place systems that are as connected and inclusive as they are flexible, able to respond at a moment’s notice. Leading means awakening a common purpose and fostering collaboration in every corner of the enterprise. Even controlling is put to new use, less about oversight and more about making room for feedback and learning to inform adaptive decisions. In this way, traditional functions are not jettisoned but made fluid and forward-thinking, allowing an organization to address complexity clearly and courageously. This reimagining aligns with Esenyel, who argues that leadership must evolve to serve the needs of a digital, inclusive workplace6. Strategic leaders reshape these old models to tap into the collective intelligence required for today’s environment.

References:

  1. Edmondson, A. C. (2019). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley.
  2. Esenyel, V. (2024). Leadership and management in the digital age. Routledge.
  3. Schoemaker, P. J. H., & Day, G. S. (2023). See sooner, act faster: How agile leaders navigate uncertainty. MIT Press.
  4. Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2017). Complexity leadership: Enabling people and organizations for adaptability. Organizational Dynamics, 46(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2016.12.001


1 Vildan Esenyel, “Integrating Contemporary Theories for VUCA Realities,” Administrative Sciences 14, no. 11
(2024): 270, https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14110270.
2 George S. Day and Paul J. H. Schoemaker, See Sooner, Act Faster: How Vigilant Leaders Thrive in an Era of Digital Turbulence (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2019).
3 Esenyel, “Integrating Contemporary Theories.”
4 Mary Uhl-Bien and Michael Arena, “Complexity Leadership: Enabling People and Organizations for Adaptability,”
Organizational Dynamics 46, no. 1 (2017): 9–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2016.12.001.
5 Amy C. Edmondson, The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning,
Innovation, and Growth (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2019).
6 Esenyel, “Integrating Contemporary Theories.”

Join the Conversation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Also In This Issue

Explore More in this Issue

The Wider Lens · See It Differently

Read the Scene Before You Solve the Crime

A detective arrives at a crime scene after the story has already begun. Something happened there. People acted, decisions were made, and events unfolded in a particular order. Some things may have been moved while others were left untouched. Someone may be telling the truth, someone may be lying, and someone else may be completely sincere and still be wrong about what they saw. The detective wasn’t there, yet the detective is expected to determine what happened. That requires more than finding evidence. It requires developing an understanding of the scene. The temptation, of course, is to begin solving the crime immediately. A broken window suggests an entry point. A missing object suggests a motive. A witness identifies someone who seemed suspicious. One fact connects with another, and almost immediately a possible explanation begins to form. That isn’t necessarily a problem. Detectives need theories because without interpretation, evidence remains a collection of disconnected facts. The danger comes when the detective begins seeing the scene through the theory rather than allowing the scene to shape the theory.

Read More
Feature Article · Examine It Deeply

Understanding Reframed

Leadership Begins Before Action
Leadership begins with the intentional and disciplined expansion of understanding.
The implication is practical as much as philosophical: before leaders communicate, decide, coach,
influence, or guide change, they first interpret what is happening. Expanding understanding means
deliberately improving that interpretation before action gives it visible form.
Leadership has understandably concentrated on action. Actions are observable. We can watch
leaders communicate, make decisions, resolve conflict, coach employees, or guide organizations
through change. These behaviors leave evidence that can be studied, measured, refined, and
taught. It is only natural that leadership research has devoted much of its attention to what leaders
do.
Yet every action has a beginning that cannot be observed.
Long before a leader speaks, an internal conversation has already begun: information is gathered,
prior experience is recalled, assumptions are tested, priorities are weighed, and meaning is
constructed. Whether this process lasts seconds or weeks, it shapes the leadership action that
follows.

Read More
From the Editor · Why This Matters

From the Editor

The pace of change continues to accelerate. Organizations, communities, and societies are
navigating increasing complexity, uncertainty, and competing perspectives. As our world evolves,
leaders are continually called upon to interpret new realities, make difficult decisions, and guide
others through change.
Those demands require more than experience alone. They require an understanding that
continues to evolve.
Leading Reframed is founded on a simple belief: understanding is never complete. Every leader
interprets the world through the lens of current experience, knowledge, and perspective. Those
lenses are valuable, but they are never complete. Leadership requires a continual commitment to
expanding our understanding through intentional reframing.
Reframing is the intentional practice of expanding our understanding by examining familiar ideas from new perspectives. It does not ask us to abandon what we already know. Instead, it invites us to build upon it. The purpose of reframing is not to replace our understanding—it is to expand it, with intention. That simple idea shapes every issue of this journal. Whether exploring communication, influence, planning, coaching, organizational change, first-line leadership, or another leadership challenge, our purpose remains the same: to encourage thoughtful reflection, broaden perspective, and help leaders continually expand their understanding of the realities they are called to influence.

Read More

Leading Reframed

Leading Insights for a Changing World

Get Involved

Connect

Get the Issue in Your Inbox

One email when a new issue publishes. No spam, no daily noise — just the monthly issue and the occasional important update.

© 2026 Leading Reframed

Powered By Techformia

Leading Reframed

Leading Insights for a Changing World

Get Involved

Connect

Get the Issue in Your Inbox

One email when a new issue publishes. No spam, no daily noise — just the monthly issue and the occasional important update.

© 2026 Leading Reframed

Powered By Techformia